| The sharp
pencils are out at the White House. Karl Rove has assembled all his nervous poll takers
and heavy political thinkers to map a strategy to get the president back on the right
track. Or perhaps to get him off the "right" track? Recent numbers have shown the "Great Pretender"
dropping dramatically in the polls. Even his right-wing co-conspirators in the House and
Senate have deserted him on recent votes. His crowning achievement, the irresponsibly huge
taxcut, is not that popular with the general public. It could turn into a millstone around
his neck if the surplus disappears more quickly than now predicted. He could be forced to
use the Medicare or Social Security surplus to mask the deficits that are likely to appear
before the 2002 midterm elections. And, as we all know, both Parties have promised not to
touch these funds. So what scheme can Rove and his merry band of pranksters contrive?
First of all, they now realize what a mistake it
was to "diss" the enviromental issues. Approving more arsenic in our drinking
water was not a wise decision. Neither was the decision to support their oil friends to
drill in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge. Their dilemma is to convince the American people that
they are more "environmental" than portrayed in the "liberal media" or
to convince them that they are not that cozy with the Big Oil companies. The odds are that
they will attempt the former.
Also, his true nature is beginning to take shape
in the public's eyes. Most politicians run their campaigns from the left or the right - to
appeal to their base voters - and then govern toward the center. Uncharacteristically,
this pResident campaigned from the center and has governed from the far right. His
nominations of John Ashcroft, Ted Olsen, and Elliott Abrams have only validated the fears
of many of his supporters in the center.
So, what should be the new strategy? Thanks to Jim
Jeffords, the Democrats are now in control of the Senate. Their first vote was on the very
popular Patient Bill of Rights - which the pResident has threatened to veto. As governor
of Texas and for the first few months in the White House, he thought
"bi-partisanship" meant getting one or more Democrats to go along with his
"programs." It has never dawned on him that "bi-partisanship" may mean
he has to compromise with someone else's programs.
The "Great Pretender" must do more than
simply shovel taxcuts and platitudes to his supporters. When he loses the House in the
next election, they will turn on him like a wolf with rabies. Abraham Lincoln once asked a
friend, "If you call the horse's tail a leg, how many legs would the horse
have?" "Five, of course," said his friend. "No," said Abe,
"Calling a horse's ass a leg doesn't make it so." And so it is with the present
Resident in the White House. A leopard cannot change its spots. |